The definitive guide to gene editing.
Menu
Home Learn News Ask the Atlas
Explore Technologies Diseases Treatments Clinical Trials Companies Scientists Genes Research Institutions
Beyond medicine Agriculture Ethics Investing World map
Learn & Tools Start here Glossary A–Z Compare technologies Timeline Lists & Rankings AI Agents ★ Saved API
About About us Methodology Data Sources Editorial Policy Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Guided View
New to genetics? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same pages, with the help built in.

⚡ Expert View
You already know the biology. Just the content — clean and compact, no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
Light mode

Treatment · Rare genetic disease

Bespoke base editor for CPS1 deficiency (the KJ Muldoon case)

A gene-editing medicine designed, manufactured and administered for a single infant in roughly six months — the first personalised in vivo editing therapy.

Completed base editingin vivon-of-1personalised
Clinical research Being tested in people in registered clinical trials. Being in trials is not evidence that a treatment works or is safe.

Simple explanation

An infant, KJ Muldoon, was born with a severe metabolic disorder in which the liver cannot process ammonia, a condition that is often fatal early in life. A team designed a base editor aimed at his specific mutation, made it, obtained approval to use it, and gave it to him at seven and eight months old. He improved and went home. One patient — but a demonstration that a medicine can be built for one person.

Go deeper

A patient-specific adenine base editor delivered by lipid nanoparticle was designed against an individual CPS1 variant causing severe carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 deficiency, progressing from diagnosis to dosing in approximately six months. Two doses were administered at seven and eight months of age. The case was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the patient was discharged from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia approximately two months after the second infusion.

Why one patient matters here

Ordinarily a single case proves very little. What this case demonstrates is not efficacy but feasibility: that the design, manufacture, regulatory review and administration of a bespoke editing medicine can be compressed into months rather than years. If that becomes routine, it changes what is possible for the thousands of ultra-rare genetic conditions that will never have a commercial programme.

The FDA has since moved in this direction, publishing draft guidance in February 2026 on how individualised therapies for ultra-rare diseases might be approved — including a framework under which improvement in a single participant could support approval in defined circumstances.

ImportantThis was one patient, treated under an individual authorisation. It is not an approved product and cannot be requested.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Educational information only This page is a reference, not medical advice. Research and regulatory status change; check the last-updated date above and confirm anything important against the primary sources listed.