The definitive guide to gene editing.
Menu
Home Learn News Ask the Atlas
Explore Technologies Diseases Treatments Clinical Trials Companies Scientists Genes Research Institutions
Beyond medicine Agriculture Ethics Investing World map
Learn & Tools Start here Glossary A–Z Compare technologies Timeline Lists & Rankings AI Agents ★ Saved API
About About us Methodology Data Sources Editorial Policy Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Guided View
New to genetics? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same pages, with the help built in.

⚡ Expert View
You already know the biology. Just the content — clean and compact, no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
Light mode

Scientist · Biochemistry

Jennifer Doudna

Structural biochemist who, with Emmanuelle Charpentier, showed that Cas9 could be programmed with a single guide RNA to cut chosen DNA — and shared the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it.

Nobel laureateCRISPR-Cas9

Simple explanation

Jennifer Doudna studies the shapes of molecules and what those shapes let them do. Working with Emmanuelle Charpentier, she showed that a bacterial defence protein called Cas9 could be aimed at any piece of DNA you chose, simply by giving it a matching RNA guide. That result turned an obscure feature of bacterial immunity into a tool used in essentially every biology laboratory in the world.

Go deeper

Jennifer Doudna is Professor of Chemistry and of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. Her structural work on RNA catalysis and RNA-protein complexes led to the 2012 Jinek et al. paper with Emmanuelle Charpentier demonstrating programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA cleavage by Cas9 and the engineering of a single guide RNA. She founded the Innovative Genomics Institute and has been a persistent public voice on the ethics of human germline editing.

Major contributions

On the credit dispute

Priority over CRISPR genome editing has been contested for more than a decade, principally between the University of California and the Broad Institute over patents covering use in eukaryotic cells. The Nobel Committee recognised Doudna and Charpentier for the development of the method; the patent position in the United States has at points favoured the Broad. These are separate questions decided by separate bodies on separate criteria, and the Atlas does not attempt to resolve either.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Educational information only This page is a reference, not medical advice. Research and regulatory status change; check the last-updated date above and confirm anything important against the primary sources listed.