Исчерпывающий путеводитель по редактированию генов.
Меню
Главная Учиться Новости Спросить Atlas
Изучить Технологии Заболевания Методы лечения Клинические исследования Компании Учёные Гены Исследования Учреждения
За пределами медицины Сельское хозяйство Этика Инвестирование Карта мира
Обучение и инструменты Начните здесь Глоссарий А–Я Сравнить технологии Хронология Списки и рейтинги ИИ-агенты ★ Сохранено API
О нас О нас Методология Источники данных Редакционная политика Контакты Отказ от ответственности

🧭 Режим с подсказками
Впервые в генетике? Мы объясняем каждый термин прямо в процессе просмотра, простым языком. Те же страницы — со встроенной подсказкой.

⚡ Взгляд эксперта
Биология вам уже знакома. Только содержание — чисто и компактно, без лишних пояснений. Это вид по умолчанию.

Язык интерфейса
Светлый режим

Scientist · Ethics case

He Jiankui

The scientist who edited human embryos and brought about the birth of gene-edited children in 2018 — an act condemned worldwide, for which he was imprisoned.

germlinemisconduct

Простое объяснение

In November 2018 He Jiankui announced that he had edited the CCR5 gene in human embryos and that twin girls had been born from them. The stated aim was resistance to HIV — a condition that is preventable and treatable by other means. The work was condemned across the scientific world for its secrecy, its inadequate consent process, its unnecessary risk to healthy children, and the fact that the edits are heritable. He was convicted in China and imprisoned for three years.

Углубиться в тему

He Jiankui, then at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, announced in November 2018 the birth of twins from embryos in which CCR5 had been edited using CRISPR-Cas9, with a third child born later. The work was widely condemned: the medical justification was absent, the consent process was found to be deficient, editing was mosaic and did not reproduce the protective CCR5-Δ32 variant, and the changes are heritable. He was convicted of illegal medical practice and sentenced to three years in prison, released in 2022. The episode prompted the WHO expert advisory committee on human genome editing and a strengthening of germline prohibitions in many jurisdictions.

Why this record exists here

It would be simpler to leave this out. It is included because the episode is the single most consequential event in the field's governance history, because it is routinely misdescribed, and because leaving it out would make this site's ethics coverage dishonest. The children involved are private individuals and this record contains nothing identifying about them.

ImportantThis is a record of scientific misconduct, included for its historical and ethical significance. It is not a profile of scientific achievement.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Только в образовательных целях Эта страница — справочный материал, а не медицинская консультация. Статусы исследований и регуляторных процессов меняются; проверяйте дату последнего обновления выше и уточняйте всё важное по первичным источникам, указанным на странице.