De definitieve gids voor genbewerking.
Menu
Home Leren Nieuws Vraag de Atlas
Verkennen Technologieën Ziekten Behandelingen Klinische onderzoeken Bedrijven Wetenschappers Genen Onderzoek Instellingen
Verder dan geneeskunde Landbouw Ethiek Investeren Wereldkaart
Leren & Tools Begin hier Woordenlijst A–Z Vergelijk technologieën Tijdlijn Lijsten & Rankings AI-agents ★ Opgeslagen API
Over Over ons Methodologie Databronnen Redactioneel beleid Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Begeleide weergave
Nieuw in de genetica? We leggen elk begrip uit terwijl je bladert, in gewone taal. Dezelfde pagina's, met de hulp ingebouwd.

⚡ Expertvisie
Je kent de biologie al. Alleen de inhoud — helder en compact, zonder extra uitleg. Dit is de standaardweergave.

Interfacetaal
Lichte modus

Scientist · Ethics case

He Jiankui

The scientist who edited human embryos and brought about the birth of gene-edited children in 2018 — an act condemned worldwide, for which he was imprisoned.

germlinemisconduct

Eenvoudige uitleg

In November 2018 He Jiankui announced that he had edited the CCR5 gene in human embryos and that twin girls had been born from them. The stated aim was resistance to HIV — a condition that is preventable and treatable by other means. The work was condemned across the scientific world for its secrecy, its inadequate consent process, its unnecessary risk to healthy children, and the fact that the edits are heritable. He was convicted in China and imprisoned for three years.

Dieper ingaan

He Jiankui, then at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, announced in November 2018 the birth of twins from embryos in which CCR5 had been edited using CRISPR-Cas9, with a third child born later. The work was widely condemned: the medical justification was absent, the consent process was found to be deficient, editing was mosaic and did not reproduce the protective CCR5-Δ32 variant, and the changes are heritable. He was convicted of illegal medical practice and sentenced to three years in prison, released in 2022. The episode prompted the WHO expert advisory committee on human genome editing and a strengthening of germline prohibitions in many jurisdictions.

Why this record exists here

It would be simpler to leave this out. It is included because the episode is the single most consequential event in the field's governance history, because it is routinely misdescribed, and because leaving it out would make this site's ethics coverage dishonest. The children involved are private individuals and this record contains nothing identifying about them.

ImportantThis is a record of scientific misconduct, included for its historical and ethical significance. It is not a profile of scientific achievement.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Alleen educatieve informatie Deze pagina is een naslagbron, geen medisch advies. Onderzoeks- en regelgevingsstatus veranderen; controleer de datum van de laatste update hierboven en verifieer belangrijke informatie bij de vermelde primaire bronnen.