Panduan definitif tentang penyuntingan gen.
Menu
Beranda Pelajari Berita Tanya Atlas
Jelajahi Teknologi Penyakit Perawatan Uji Klinis Perusahaan Ilmuwan Gen-gen Penelitian Institusi
Di luar dunia medis Pertanian Etika Investasi Peta dunia
Pelajari & Alat Mulai di sini Glosarium A–Z Bandingkan teknologi Linimasa Daftar & Peringkat Agen AI ★ Tersimpan API
Tentang Tentang kami Metodologi Sumber Data Kebijakan Editorial Kontak Penafian

🧭 Tampilan Terpandu
Baru mengenal genetika? Kami menjelaskan setiap istilah saat kamu menjelajah, dalam bahasa yang mudah dipahami. Halaman yang sama, dengan bantuan yang sudah tersedia.

⚡ Pandangan Ahli
Kamu sudah mengenal biologinya. Cukup kontennya — ringkas dan padat, tanpa penjelasan tambahan. Ini adalah tampilan default.

Bahasa antarmuka
Mode terang

Scientist · Ethics case

He Jiankui

The scientist who edited human embryos and brought about the birth of gene-edited children in 2018 — an act condemned worldwide, for which he was imprisoned.

germlinemisconduct

Penjelasan sederhana

In November 2018 He Jiankui announced that he had edited the CCR5 gene in human embryos and that twin girls had been born from them. The stated aim was resistance to HIV — a condition that is preventable and treatable by other means. The work was condemned across the scientific world for its secrecy, its inadequate consent process, its unnecessary risk to healthy children, and the fact that the edits are heritable. He was convicted in China and imprisoned for three years.

Pelajari lebih dalam

He Jiankui, then at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, announced in November 2018 the birth of twins from embryos in which CCR5 had been edited using CRISPR-Cas9, with a third child born later. The work was widely condemned: the medical justification was absent, the consent process was found to be deficient, editing was mosaic and did not reproduce the protective CCR5-Δ32 variant, and the changes are heritable. He was convicted of illegal medical practice and sentenced to three years in prison, released in 2022. The episode prompted the WHO expert advisory committee on human genome editing and a strengthening of germline prohibitions in many jurisdictions.

Why this record exists here

It would be simpler to leave this out. It is included because the episode is the single most consequential event in the field's governance history, because it is routinely misdescribed, and because leaving it out would make this site's ethics coverage dishonest. The children involved are private individuals and this record contains nothing identifying about them.

ImportantThis is a record of scientific misconduct, included for its historical and ethical significance. It is not a profile of scientific achievement.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Hanya informasi edukatif Halaman ini adalah referensi, bukan nasihat medis. Status riset dan regulasi dapat berubah; periksa tanggal pembaruan terakhir di atas dan konfirmasi hal-hal penting dengan sumber primer yang tercantum.