Le guide de référence sur l'édition génomique.
Menu
Accueil Apprendre Actualités Demandez à l'Atlas
Explorer Technologies Maladies Traitements Essais cliniques Entreprises Scientifiques Gènes Recherche Institutions
Au-delà de la médecine Agriculture Éthique Investissement Carte du monde
Apprendre & Outils Commencer ici Glossaire A–Z Comparer les technologies Chronologie Listes & Classements Agents IA ★ Enregistré API
À propos À propos de nous Méthodologie Sources de données Politique éditoriale Contact Avertissements

🧭 Vue guidée
Nouveau en génétique ? Nous expliquons chaque terme au fil de votre navigation, en langage clair. Les mêmes pages, avec l'aide intégrée.

⚡ Point de vue d'expert
Vous connaissez déjà la biologie. Uniquement le contenu — clair et concis, sans explications supplémentaires. C'est l'affichage par défaut.

Langue de l'interface
Mode clair

Scientist · Ethics case

He Jiankui

The scientist who edited human embryos and brought about the birth of gene-edited children in 2018 — an act condemned worldwide, for which he was imprisoned.

germlinemisconduct

Explication simple

In November 2018 He Jiankui announced that he had edited the CCR5 gene in human embryos and that twin girls had been born from them. The stated aim was resistance to HIV — a condition that is preventable and treatable by other means. The work was condemned across the scientific world for its secrecy, its inadequate consent process, its unnecessary risk to healthy children, and the fact that the edits are heritable. He was convicted in China and imprisoned for three years.

Aller plus loin

He Jiankui, then at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, announced in November 2018 the birth of twins from embryos in which CCR5 had been edited using CRISPR-Cas9, with a third child born later. The work was widely condemned: the medical justification was absent, the consent process was found to be deficient, editing was mosaic and did not reproduce the protective CCR5-Δ32 variant, and the changes are heritable. He was convicted of illegal medical practice and sentenced to three years in prison, released in 2022. The episode prompted the WHO expert advisory committee on human genome editing and a strengthening of germline prohibitions in many jurisdictions.

Why this record exists here

It would be simpler to leave this out. It is included because the episode is the single most consequential event in the field's governance history, because it is routinely misdescribed, and because leaving it out would make this site's ethics coverage dishonest. The children involved are private individuals and this record contains nothing identifying about them.

ImportantThis is a record of scientific misconduct, included for its historical and ethical significance. It is not a profile of scientific achievement.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

Information éducative uniquement Cette page est une ressource de référence, et non un conseil médical. L'état de la recherche et des autorisations réglementaires évolue ; vérifiez la date de dernière mise à jour ci-dessus et confirmez tout élément important auprès des sources primaires indiquées.