유전자 편집 완벽 가이드.
메뉴
배우기 뉴스 아틀라스에 질문하기
둘러보기 기술들 질환 치료법들 임상시험 기업 과학자들 유전자 연구 기관
의학을 넘어서 농업 윤리 투자 세계 지도
배우기 & 도구 여기서 시작하세요 용어집 A–Z 기술 비교 타임라인 목록 & 순위 AI 에이전트 ★ 저장됨 API
소개 소개 방법론 데이터 출처 편집 방침 문의 면책 조항

🧭 안내 보기
유전학이 처음이신가요? 둘러보시는 동안 모든 용어를 쉬운 말로 설명해 드립니다. 도움말이 내장된 동일한 페이지입니다.

⚡ 전문가 견해
생물학은 이미 알고 계시죠. 내용만 — 깔끔하고 간결하게, 추가 설명 없이. 기본 보기입니다.

인터페이스 언어
라이트 모드

CRISPR basics · 5 분 분량

How cells repair DNA — and why it decides the edit

The cell, not the editor, makes the change. Which repair pathway it uses determines what you actually get.

짧은 답변

CRISPR breaks the DNA. What happens next is up to the cell, and it has several ways of fixing a break. The quick, messy one usually leaves a few letters wrong, which breaks the gene — useful if that is what you wanted. The careful one can copy in an exact replacement, but it only works in cells that are dividing, and even then it often does not. That is why 'fixing' a gene is so much harder than breaking one.

Double-strand break repair proceeds mainly by non-homologous end joining — active throughout the cell cycle, error-prone, producing indels — or homology-directed repair, restricted to S and G2 phase and requiring a homologous template. Microhomology-mediated end joining produces predictable deletions. Repair choice determines editing outcome, so it is manipulated experimentally by cell-cycle synchronisation, pathway inhibition and template design.

What happens after the cut — the cell decides, not the scientist a break in both strands Path 1 — glue the ends back (NHEJ) Fast, always available — but it usually loses or adds a few letters at the join. Result: the gene is scrambled and stops working. Useful when switching a gene OFF is the goal. Path 2 — copy a template (HDR) If a matching template is supplied, the cell can copy it and rebuild the sequence exactly. Result: a precise, intended correction. Much rarer, and barely works in resting cells.
This is the single most important limitation of cut-and-repair editing: knocking a gene out is reliable, correcting one letter is not. It is the reason base and prime editing were invented.

What can go wrong at a break

ImportantThese are the specific hazards that motivated base editing and prime editing, which nick rather than sever and so never trigger this repair cascade.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.