La guida definitiva all'editing genico.
Menu
Home Scopri Notizie Chiedi all'Atlas
Esplora Tecnologie Malattie Trattamenti Sperimentazioni cliniche Aziende Scienziati Geni Ricerca Istituzioni
Oltre la medicina Agricoltura Etica Investimenti Mappa del mondo
Scopri e strumenti Inizia da qui Glossario A–Z Confronta le tecnologie Cronologia Elenchi e classifiche Agenti IA ★ Salvato API
Informazioni Chi siamo Metodologia Fonti dei dati Politica editoriale Contatti Note legali

🧭 Vista guidata
Sei nuovo alla genetica? Spieghiamo ogni termine mentre navighi, in parole semplici. Le stesse pagine, con il supporto già incluso.

⚡ Parere degli esperti
Conosci già la biologia. Solo i contenuti — chiari e compatti, senza spiegazioni aggiuntive. Questa è la visualizzazione predefinita.

Lingua dell'interfaccia
Modalità chiara

CRISPR basics · 5 min di lettura

How cells repair DNA — and why it decides the edit

The cell, not the editor, makes the change. Which repair pathway it uses determines what you actually get.

La risposta breve

CRISPR breaks the DNA. What happens next is up to the cell, and it has several ways of fixing a break. The quick, messy one usually leaves a few letters wrong, which breaks the gene — useful if that is what you wanted. The careful one can copy in an exact replacement, but it only works in cells that are dividing, and even then it often does not. That is why 'fixing' a gene is so much harder than breaking one.

Double-strand break repair proceeds mainly by non-homologous end joining — active throughout the cell cycle, error-prone, producing indels — or homology-directed repair, restricted to S and G2 phase and requiring a homologous template. Microhomology-mediated end joining produces predictable deletions. Repair choice determines editing outcome, so it is manipulated experimentally by cell-cycle synchronisation, pathway inhibition and template design.

What happens after the cut — the cell decides, not the scientist a break in both strands Path 1 — glue the ends back (NHEJ) Fast, always available — but it usually loses or adds a few letters at the join. Result: the gene is scrambled and stops working. Useful when switching a gene OFF is the goal. Path 2 — copy a template (HDR) If a matching template is supplied, the cell can copy it and rebuild the sequence exactly. Result: a precise, intended correction. Much rarer, and barely works in resting cells.
This is the single most important limitation of cut-and-repair editing: knocking a gene out is reliable, correcting one letter is not. It is the reason base and prime editing were invented.

What can go wrong at a break

ImportantThese are the specific hazards that motivated base editing and prime editing, which nick rather than sever and so never trigger this repair cascade.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.