Le guide de référence sur l'édition génomique.
Menu
Accueil Apprendre Actualités Demandez à l'Atlas
Explorer Technologies Maladies Traitements Essais cliniques Entreprises Scientifiques Gènes Recherche Institutions
Au-delà de la médecine Agriculture Éthique Investissement Carte du monde
Apprendre & Outils Commencer ici Glossaire A–Z Comparer les technologies Chronologie Listes & Classements Agents IA ★ Enregistré API
À propos À propos de nous Méthodologie Sources de données Politique éditoriale Contact Avertissements

🧭 Vue guidée
Nouveau en génétique ? Nous expliquons chaque terme au fil de votre navigation, en langage clair. Les mêmes pages, avec l'aide intégrée.

⚡ Point de vue d'expert
Vous connaissez déjà la biologie. Uniquement le contenu — clair et concis, sans explications supplémentaires. C'est l'affichage par défaut.

Langue de l'interface
Mode clair

CRISPR basics · 5 min de lecture

How cells repair DNA — and why it decides the edit

The cell, not the editor, makes the change. Which repair pathway it uses determines what you actually get.

La réponse courte

CRISPR breaks the DNA. What happens next is up to the cell, and it has several ways of fixing a break. The quick, messy one usually leaves a few letters wrong, which breaks the gene — useful if that is what you wanted. The careful one can copy in an exact replacement, but it only works in cells that are dividing, and even then it often does not. That is why 'fixing' a gene is so much harder than breaking one.

Double-strand break repair proceeds mainly by non-homologous end joining — active throughout the cell cycle, error-prone, producing indels — or homology-directed repair, restricted to S and G2 phase and requiring a homologous template. Microhomology-mediated end joining produces predictable deletions. Repair choice determines editing outcome, so it is manipulated experimentally by cell-cycle synchronisation, pathway inhibition and template design.

What happens after the cut — the cell decides, not the scientist a break in both strands Path 1 — glue the ends back (NHEJ) Fast, always available — but it usually loses or adds a few letters at the join. Result: the gene is scrambled and stops working. Useful when switching a gene OFF is the goal. Path 2 — copy a template (HDR) If a matching template is supplied, the cell can copy it and rebuild the sequence exactly. Result: a precise, intended correction. Much rarer, and barely works in resting cells.
This is the single most important limitation of cut-and-repair editing: knocking a gene out is reliable, correcting one letter is not. It is the reason base and prime editing were invented.

What can go wrong at a break

ImportantThese are the specific hazards that motivated base editing and prime editing, which nick rather than sever and so never trigger this repair cascade.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.