The definitive guide to gene editing.
Menu
Home Learn News Ask the Atlas
Explore Technologies Diseases Treatments Clinical Trials Companies Scientists Genes Research Institutions
Beyond medicine Agriculture Ethics Investing World map
Learn & Tools Start here Glossary A–Z Compare technologies Timeline Lists & Rankings AI Agents ★ Saved API
About About us Methodology Data Sources Editorial Policy Contact Disclaimers

🧭 Guided View
New to genetics? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same pages, with the help built in.

⚡ Expert View
You already know the biology. Just the content — clean and compact, no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
Light mode

Disease · Muscular disease

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

A severe muscle-wasting disease caused by mutations in the largest gene in the human genome — and the clearest demonstration that delivery, not editing, is the field's limiting problem.

Preclinical muscledelivery problemDMD
Preclinical research Tested in cells and animals only. Most preclinical programmes never reach people, and animal results often do not carry over.

Simple explanation

Muscle cells need a protein called dystrophin to survive being used. Without it they tear themselves apart a little more each time they contract, and muscle is gradually replaced by scar and fat. The gene is enormous — the largest in the human genome — and thousands of different mutations can break it. Editing could in principle repair it, but the obstacle is arithmetic: muscle is roughly forty per cent of the body, and there is no way yet to reach enough of it.

Go deeper

Duchenne muscular dystrophy results from out-of-frame DMD mutations abolishing dystrophin, an X-linked condition affecting approximately 1 in 5,000 male births. Editing strategies focus on exon skipping — excising an exon to restore the reading frame and produce an internally truncated but partially functional protein, the same logic as the milder Becker phenotype. The obstacle is systemic delivery to skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and the muscle stem cell compartment; AAV doses sufficient to reach muscle broadly have caused severe and fatal immune and hepatic toxicity in gene-therapy trials.

Why this is the hard case

Nearly everything about Duchenne is unfavourable. The target tissue is vast and distributed. Muscle stem cells must be edited too or the benefit is lost as fibres turn over. The gene is too large to deliver a replacement copy, so editing is one of few options. The high AAV doses needed have caused deaths in gene-therapy trials, which is a hard ceiling on that route. And the mutations are heterogeneous, so a single exon-skipping strategy helps only the subset of patients whose mutation it fits.

None of that makes it impossible. It does mean that anyone describing CRISPR as close to treating Duchenne is not describing where the work actually is.

Why this is the hard case
Muscle fibres, some intact and some damaged where the supporting structure has failed. Illustration generated for The CRISPR Atlas — a visual aid, not a photograph or a literal depiction of molecular structure.

Where the work is

Preclinical, in dogs and mice, with real functional improvement demonstrated in animals and durability questions unresolved. The most promising directions are better muscle-tropic AAV capsids, non-viral delivery, and integrase approaches that could install a whole functional gene rather than skipping an exon.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

News connected to this page

Matched automatically to this record. Every item links to its publisher.

Educational information only This page is a reference, not medical advice. Research and regulatory status change; check the last-updated date above and confirm anything important against the primary sources listed.