ゲノム編集の決定版ガイド。
メニュー
ホーム 学ぶ ニュース Atlasに聞く
探索する 技術 疾患 治療法 臨床試験 企業 科学者 遺伝子 研究 研究機関
医療を超えて 農業 倫理 投資 世界地図
学ぶ・ツール まずはここから 用語集 A~Z 技術を比較する タイムライン リスト・ランキング AIエージェント ★ 保存済み API
このサイトについて 私たちについて 方法論 データソース 編集方針 お問い合わせ 免責事項

🧭 ガイドビュー
遺伝学が初めてですか? 閲覧しながら、すべての用語をわかりやすく説明します。同じページに、サポートが組み込まれています。

⚡ 専門家の見解
生物学はすでにご存知の方へ。コンテンツだけをすっきりとコンパクトに、余分な説明なしでお届けします。これがデフォルト表示です。

表示言語
ライトモード

Disease · Rare genetic disease

Chronic Granulomatous Disease

A rare immune disorder in which white blood cells cannot kill the bacteria they engulf — and the first condition treated with prime editing in humans.

Phase I/II immuneprime editingfirst-in-human
Clinical research Being tested in people in registered clinical trials. Being in trials is not evidence that a treatment works or is safe.

わかりやすい説明

White blood cells swallow bacteria and then produce a burst of reactive chemicals to destroy them. In chronic granulomatous disease the machinery that makes that burst is broken, so the cells can catch germs but not kill them, leading to repeated severe infections. In 2025 this became the first disease treated with prime editing: a patient's own blood stem cells were corrected outside the body and returned.

さらに深く掘り下げる

CGD results from defects in NADPH oxidase subunits; the autosomal recessive p47phox form is most often caused by a GT dinucleotide deletion in NCF1. PM359 corrects that deletion by prime editing in autologous CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells, which are reinfused after busulfan conditioning. Published results in the first participants reported prompt neutrophil and platelet engraftment, 69 per cent and 83 per cent dihydrorhodamine-positive neutrophils by day 30, durable restoration of NADPH oxidase activity, and early clinical benefit including resolution of CGD-associated colitis.

What this establishes

That prime editing works clinically. Until this result, prime editing's clinical case rested on laboratory capability and theoretical breadth. Two patients with restored immune function and early clinical improvement is a small dataset, and it is a categorically different kind of evidence from anything that preceded it.

It should be read for what it is: a first-in-human report in a very small number of participants with short follow-up, published in a major journal precisely because the finding is a first.

ImportantTwo participants is not evidence of general efficacy or safety. The trial continues.

Sources

Connected in the Atlas

Every entry on this site is linked to the others it relates to. These connections are part of the record, not a search result.

教育目的の情報のみ このページはリファレンスであり、医療上のアドバイスではありません。研究・規制上のステータスは変わることがあります。上記の最終更新日を確認し、重要な情報は記載の一次情報源で必ずご確認ください。